What this means
Start with the exact decision in front of you.
A meeting proceeds on papers without attendance, while a hearing can test disputed evidence and usually takes place in public. The panel makes findings and a recommendation; the final prohibition decision is made on behalf of the Secretary of State.
Immediate priorities
Organise the position before responding.
Confirm whether the case is listed as a hearing or meeting
Check attendance, privacy and virtual-hearing arrangements
Prepare separately for facts, misconduct and prohibition
Detailed guidance
The procedure, evidence and possible route from here.
01
Know the difference between a hearing and meeting
A professional conduct panel meeting takes place in private on the papers, without witnesses, the teacher or presenting officer attending. It is considered only for an admitted case suitable for that route. A hearing is used where facts or serious misconduct are disputed and generally permits live evidence and questioning. Both routes can lead to a panel recommendation and a final decision made for the Secretary of State, so neither should be treated as an informal conference.
TRA hearings are ordinarily public and are currently virtual by default, subject to requests and case-specific decisions about format or privacy. Confirm the arrangement in the Notice of Hearing. If an in-person hearing, remote participation, private session or other adjustment is sought, apply within the stated procedure and provide reasons. Do not assume that sensitive subject matter alone closes the entire hearing; the panel must balance fairness, privacy and open proceedings.
- Confirm whether the route is a meeting or hearing
- Check the listed format and attendance arrangements
- Apply for privacy or adjustment with evidence
02
Follow the hearing's decision sequence
At a hearing, the presenting officer outlines the case and calls evidence. The teacher or representative can test that evidence, present their own material and make submissions. The presenting officer bears the burden of proving alleged facts on the balance of probabilities. The panel then decides whether proved facts amount to unacceptable professional conduct, conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute or conviction of a relevant offence, as applicable.
If serious misconduct is found, mitigation and the public-interest question of prohibition follow. The panel considers the Secretary of State's published prohibition guidance and makes a recommendation. The final decision is made by a senior TRA official on behalf of the Secretary of State, usually after the panel concludes. Keep a clear note of findings and reasons because the recommendation and final order are distinct parts of the outcome.
- Track factual findings separately
- Address each serious-misconduct category relied upon
- Distinguish panel recommendation from final decision
03
Prepare participation and the final record
Attendance is an opportunity to hear the case, give evidence and respond, but it requires preparation. Review the bundle, witness order, agreed facts and applications. A teacher giving evidence should answer from recollection and acknowledge limits rather than attempt to memorise a script. If not attending, understand how the panel may proceed and ensure any written evidence and explanation have been served through the required route.
After the case, obtain the decision and check findings, prohibition outcome, review period and publication status. A finding of serious misconduct can be published even where no prohibition is imposed, under the current policy described by TRA. If prohibition is imposed, calculate any High Court appeal deadline from service and comply with the order unless a valid court direction changes it. Correct employers using the formal outcome, not an informal summary.
- Prepare from the final indexed bundle
- Use evidence rather than a rehearsed script
- Record appeal, publication and effective dates
Key questions
Keep the analysis tied to this stage.
Whether the allegations are proved
Whether proved facts amount to serious misconduct
Whether prohibition is appropriate in the public interest
Advice is provided only by the regulated firm that accepts a matter.
Common questions
Clarifying the route without assuming the outcome.
Who makes the final prohibition decision?
The professional conduct panel makes findings and a recommendation. A senior TRA official makes the final decision on behalf of the Secretary of State.
Are TRA hearings always in person?
No. TRA guidance currently states that hearings are virtual by default, although an in-person hearing or different participation arrangement may be requested or directed.
Connected guidance
Continue through the topic map.
Use the hub for the full sequence or choose the connected route that matches the notice.
Official sources
Check the material for this question.
Sources checked 19 September 2026. Rules change, so compare the current notice and linked official material and tell the operator if a citation or summary needs correction.